December 13, 2011 World News News!,

Canada has shown a legally binding deal does not guarantee countries won't walk away from their commitmentsIt's been four years in the offing, but Canada on Monday finally and formally withdrew from the world's only existing legal treaty to cut greenhouse gas emissions, the Kyoto protocol.Despite criticism from environmentalists and the international community – China has called the move "irresponsible" through its state media – Canada is within its legal rights.
Protocols for Professional Learning (The Professional Learning Community Series) (PLC)
Learn more
Lois Brown Easton The environment minister, Peter Kent, said: "We are invoking our legal right to formally withdraw from Kyoto."Josh Roberts, a US-qualified lawyer at environmental law organisation ClientEarth, points out that article 27 of the Kyoto protocol allows any country to withdraw three years after the protocol is in force, ie about now. The protocol was ratified in 2005, but came into force on 1 January 2008, the start of the so-called first commitment period for countries to cut their emissions, which finishes at the end of 2012.
Protocols Of The Meetings Of The Learned Elders Of Zion
Learn more
Countries wanting to withdraw from the protocol also have to give a year's notice, according to Kyoto experts, which would explain Canada's timing – just over a year before the end of the first commitment phase.Roberts says that while the get-out clause is fairly standard in international treaties, it is rarely used. "States want the flexibility if an agreement is later decided to not be in the best interest of the country," he says. "Countries can trigger these release clauses, but it happens very rarely. For example, Japan, Norway and Iceland all left the International Whaling Commission's treaty, but such moves are rare.